Historical? Romance? Or Thriller? If the genre fits, wear it!

I’ve always had trouble categorising my fiction, which in one sense isn’t a problem. After all, genre is a device for shelving books.

In another sense, it doesn’t help. Booksellers — including Amazon — use genre for sorting books and showing them to readers. If I’m not clear what I’m writing, my books are likely to go to readers who don’t want them!

My weekend at the first New Zealand crime and thrillers convention, RotoruaNoir, has helped me clarify my thinking. Especially my preparation for the panel discussion on Genre Blending. I represented historical romance on the panel. Other members represented horror, young adult, and contemporary romance.

So here’s where I’ve got to. So far, what I’ve written represents any two and up to all three of historical fiction, romance, and crime/mystery.

I write historical fiction

Historical fiction is fiction that is is set in the past and pays attention to the manners, social conditions and other details of the story’s setting in time and place. Such stories may focus on major historical events and characters, but even if they don’t, they should at least recognise such events when they’ve recently happened, or are happening, during the time period of the story.

All but three of my stories (so far) are set in the past, most in the Regency era. I love historical detail, and do a lot of research to get it right. I try to create characters that could only have existed in that time and place, and the events and activities that are natural for people like that in a time like that. Some readers find my women too stroppy and independent for their times. I disagree. History is full of women who defied the current norms to forge their own path. Also, many people judge the whole of society by the pampered debutantes in their gilded cages. To take one example, people have commented on my character Minerva Bradford, who ran a workshop that made invalid chairs. She would not have been unusual for her time. Women of crafter families had always been crafters themselves. Indeed, part of the story is that Minerva’s family is upwardly mobile, and her father wants Minerva to give up the work and become a social ornament, like her betters.

(Not all historical romances are also historical fiction. Some are stories that could happen anywhere or anytime, but the gowns and cravats are a nice added touch. I don’t write those, but I’ve enjoyed quite a few.)

I write romance

Romance is fiction about two people (except at the menage edges of the genre) who fall in love, face challenges, and finish the story with a strong possibility of happiness together. Romance is a subset of the love story category. What sets it apart is the happy ending. I’ve always taken ‘happy ever after’ as meaning ‘having resolved conflicts in a way that gives us hope they will resolve the conflicts that are yet to come as they live their lives together’. Romance is a broad category that includes historical, contemporary, paranormal, science fiction, and suspense. It can also be categorised by the gender, species, and number of the participants, and by the ‘heat’ level — that is, by the emphasis on and level of specific detail in the sex scenes.

I believe in happy endings. I’m living one myself, and so have all my siblings and my husband’s siblings. True love isn’t magic and it isn’t easy, but it is possible and worthwhile. The ending of the written story is the beginning of a life together, which will have its ups and downs, but empathy and commitment will see the couple through. Those are my kind of romances. I’m not one to add a sex scene for the sake of it, but I don’t shy away from leaving the door open in the plot or character development require. Heat level is anything from ‘sweet’ to ‘moderate’.

I’ve written across a number of romance subgenres. Contemporary suspense. Historical suspense. Paranormal suspense. Straight historical. At the heart of it are two people in the crucible of initial attraction, learning about one another and growing to be more than they could have been alone.

I write suspense

The last category I write in is crime/mystery. This is another huge genre with blurred edges. People seem to use the term mystery for stories about solving a crime. Crime is a bit broader, including the effects of the crime. RotoruaNoir had writers from across the spectrum of the genre (most of the following can be contemporary, historical, paranormal, or sf): cosy/traditional, noir (gritty and pessimistic), hard-boiled private investigator, police procedural, spy/espionage, suspense, and thriller.

I’m struggling to fit mine in there. They’re not cosy, since they don’t shy away from gritty detail, but they’re certainly not pessimistic. I do have a private investigator, but he isn’t hard-boiled. Not police procedural. Espionage can be an element. Thriller is about high stakes and swift actions, which might be close to some of my plots. Suspense is probably closest — characters confronting evil and overcoming danger.

I knew I had romance in all my suspense stories. But I went through my titles and listed all the plot lines. With rare exceptions, they all involve solving crimes, from fraud and intimidation to blackmail, people trafficking, and murder. Turns out I have suspense in almost all of my romance stories. Certainly, all three of my contemporary romances are also suspense.

 

So this leaves me needed a new strapline

Okay. So far so good. The first step to fixing a marketing problem is to diagnose the problem. If I didn’t know what I did myself, I can hardly expect to attract readers who like it.

I’m okay with Jude Knight Storyteller as an overall brand. It covers the fact that I don’t stick to one genre but write in the overlap between them. I tell stories. But the visual imagery and the strapline (Stories to thrill, intrigue and delight) could do with some work. Watch this space.

 

Romance novels as literature

ImageQuilt 2015-05-01 at 11.18.08 AMA tweet from Julie Anne Long pointed me in the direction of an article on Penetrating Analysis, and I’ve now subscribed to the blog. In her description of the blog’s intention, blogger Anne N. Bornschien says:

This space is devoted to mass market romance novels as texts worthy of literary consideration. Approaching them both as an avid reader of the genre and as a scholar of literature, I examine the language, structure, and tropes that mark popular romance. In so doing, I hope to dispel some of the stereotypes that contribute to romance’s marginalization and to share the genre with a broader readership.

The specific article is about why romance as a genre is worthy of study. Along with several other important points, Anne says:

The past five years in particular have given rise to a new crop of novelists whose work hinges upon moral and ethical impediments that defy easy solutions. Unlike in romances predicated upon a misunderstanding (e.g., he wrongly suspects her of infidelity, she thinks he only married her for her money), where once all is revealed all is well, these texts place a dilemma at the heart of the story. They put the couple’s interests or the beloved’s interests in opposition to another person, group, or cause that is very near to the protagonist’s heart. These novels demand sacrifice or creativity of their heroes and heroines in order to arrive at the HEA.

Fear of vulnerability

48123-until-loves-vulnerableBrene Brown, a research professor and bestselling author, says that the romance genre is both loved and hated because a key theme is vulnerability. Why is this loved? Why is this hated? Rhyll of the Naughty Ninjas has written an article about Brown’s research, which in part says:

It’s that theme (constant in much of romance writing) that vulnerability is courage. When do the hero and heroine triumph by achieving true connection? When they’re able to put aside their masks and armor and allow others to see their true selves, flaws and all. When they expose their feelings. When they take a risk on love. In other words, when they allow themselves to be vulnerable. While my logical mind can’t accept this, the emotional reader part of my brain craves more.

However, it’s pretty clear that western mainstream culture disdains vulnerability and views it as weakness. Strength, control, perfection and certainty are valued and there’s very little tolerance for uncertainty, failure or risk. Being emotional or imperfect is equated with failure and weaknesses. Instead, people are encouraged (or shamed into) seeking perfection in all areas of life, from flawless looks, to perfect grades and parenting, and ever-upwardly-mobile career paths.

Very good article, and well worth reading. Thanks, Rhyll.

H/T to Amy Rose Bennett, who posted a link to the article on Facebook. Amy is the author of Lady Beauchamp’s Proposal, which I had the pleasure of reading recently.