We were at Whanganui hospital today for a routine procedure. While I waited, I examined the photos on the wall with some interest, for family lore tells me that a failure by the government to pay for the building work my great grandfather did on one of the buildings led to the bankruptcy that, in turn, led to my grandfather returning to live with his parents and to raise his seven children in the family home. The building pictured above are gone, now. Replaced with a more modern hospital–and a very efficient one, too, we found. But the old family story lingers.
In other news today, Charles III appears to have hinted that he’s open to having the remains of children, buried in the royal vaults after being exhumed from the environs of the Tower of London, tested to see if their DNA supports the oft repeated suspicion that they are the Princes in the Tower, the two sons of Edward IV. Shakespeare tells us they were horribly murdered on the command of their uncle, Richard III, because they stood between him and the throne. The story has flaws, since he already had the throne, having convinced Parliament that their father was secretly married to someone else when he wed their mother.
I’m a #RichardIIIwasframed person myself, but I’ll watch for the results of the testing with interest. Is a long standing historical injustice about to be addressed? If so, which one?
Speaking of Charles III, quite a number of voices have been raised calling for redress from the new King for colonial oppressions. It seems a bit misplaced to me, given that the Kings and Queens of England have had little real power for several hundred years. But that’s the down side of being a walking talking symbol, I suppose.
Which reminds me that it was only in 2015 that the British government finished paying off the debt incurred to compensate British slave owners for freeing their slaves. That’s right, folks. Nearly two centuries of debt to pay people to stop owning other people. I get that it was a political decision, required to get the necessary support to stop an outrage. But how about compensation for the slaves, and their descendants?
All of which goes to today’s point. History matters. Perhaps, with enough time, past injustices become merely something interesting to study, but when the impacts are still echoing in the lives of people alive today, we ignore such injustices at our peril.
Also, we did no compensating here in the USA … we just fought a civil war. The issue of reparations hangs in the air however. Yes, History Matters!
Facing up to the past matters. Apologies matter and so do reparations, though guilt doesn’t. I don’t feel guilt for any part my ancestors played in the brutal decisions and actions of the British Empire or of the New Zealand colonial government. I do feel that we cannot build a just society without giving a strong leg up to those who are still experiencing the generational disadvantage of those decisions and actions.
Henry VII did it.
He was the one with the motive. He needed his wife, the boys’ older sister, to be legitimate to strengthen his claim to the throne, so the murder and the stories about Richard achieved two things for him. Got rid of two boys with a greater right to the throne than him. Destroyed the reputation of the king whose throne he had usurped.
There’s no doubt that the residents of Leicester believe Richard III innocent of wrong-doing. But I’m skeptical of the story that the boys were secretly shipped to Devon to live out their lives as peasants, even though there seems to be some evidence of that.
There are always stories. Like the supposed children of King Charles III.